|October 15, 2014||$US5.00|
Economists and American Studies scholars have suggested that in the early Puritan community, the seemingly opposing mind sets of self-interest and the common good were not at all oppositional, but rather co-existed comfortably. We show how this perspective emerged from the dominant religious belief that social commitment was necessary for individual salvation—fostering a Puritan self-interest and social obligation merger that advanced both individual and community successes. By the early eighteenth century, the religious strands of the self-interest/common good dialectical knot had unraveled in what had become a more secularized, more political American heart. Today, a clear division of these two poles is reflected in “two radically different visions for America”—one focused on the liberties of individual self-interest and the other on social responsibility. A once polarized yet cohesive collective consciousness appears today as a collective consciousness bipolarized to the point of dysfunction. Oddly enough, those who most insistently emphasize the sovereignty of individualism often tap religious (sometimes even Puritan) reference points, missing the point that it was religion that insisted upon and ensured the integration of both individual interest and communal commitment.
|Keywords:||Governmentality, Community, Identities|
Article: Print (Spiral Bound). October 15, 2014 (Article: Electronic (PDF File; 490.443KB)). Published by The International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies.
Director, Center for Teaching and Learning, Department of English, California Lutheran University, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Associate Professor, English Department, California Lutheran University, Thousand Oaks, California, USA