The purpose of this paper is to apply Soren Kierkegaard’s concept of despair in an analysis of human fallibility in professional practices. The Danish existentialist defined the self as a synthesis of the infinite and the finite, the temporal and the eternal. A person in despair is one who denies or tries to flee the paradoxes of being in such a state. Kierkegaard viewed despair not as a feeling, but rather as an attitude or posture a person can take on towards him-or herself. Despair can consist in not wanting to be oneself, a being with specific limitations and shortcomings. The current study attempts to use this understanding of despair in an analysis of how people relate to their own fallibility at work. Cases from health care and aviation will be used to illustrate how despair can be an obstacle for constructive dialogue about mishaps and mistakes. Practitioners should seek to find the Golden Mean between despair (giving fallibility to much weight) and indifference (taking fallibility too lightly), a position characterized by mindfulness.
|Keywords:||Despair, Kierkegaard, Fallibility, Mindfulness|
Associate Professor, Department of Leadership and Organizational Behaviour, BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo, Norway
There are currently no reviews of this product.Write a Review