| Format | Price | |
|---|---|---|
| Article: Print | $US10.00 | |
| Article: Electronic | $US5.00 |
The theory of internal colonialism has been applied to the structural relationships between first nations and the settler state, economy, and society (Stavenhagen 1965; Casanova 1965; Blauner 1969; Hechter 1975, 1999; Wolpe 1975; Hartwig 1978). In this paper it will be applied to the situation of Indigenous peoples in Australia (Jennett 2011) and compared and contrasted with Blagg’s (2008) recent work on neo-colonialism in a globalised world in which he identifies the existence of two separate domains, Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal. He argues for the need for hybrid institutions which respect the Aboriginal domain and accommodate Aboriginal solutions to Aboriginal-identified problems, as well as provide access to knowledge and resources controlled by settler governments (state and national) in the non-Aboriginal domain. It will be argued that the theory of internal colonialism continues to explain the structures of power which disadvantage Indigenous Australians in a culturally allocated division of labour (Jennett 2011; Hechter 1975, 1999). However, Blagg’s focus on the institutions of the frontier may provide a much needed conceptualisation of “a way forward” which empowers Indigenous people in Australia.
| Keywords: | Internal Colonialism, Neo-Colonialism, Institutions of the Frontier, First Nations, Australia |
|---|
International Journal of the Humanities, Volume 9, Issue 5, pp.169-180. Article: Print (Spiral Bound). Article: Electronic (PDF File; 760.887KB).
Adjunct Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Arts, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia