Towards a Poetics of Performance: Embodiment and “Verfremdungseffekt” as Fuzzy Aspects of Acting

By Nicoleta Popa Blanariu.

Published by The International Journal of the Humanities: Annual Review

Format Price
Article: Print $US10.00
Article: Electronic $US5.00

In Bakhtin's opinion, "the relation to meaning is always dialogic. Even understanding itself is dialogic." Particularly, the art of acting is such a dialogic relationship that fuses character and interpreter in the same unity of the presence before the audience. In other words, acting is a "dialectic" relationship, a dialogue on a higher level (a dialogue of personalities), as Bakhtin said. Dialogic acting manifests itself between two extreme aspects (identification and "distanciation") and as a merging of them. Putting the concrete manifestation of acting and staging into a formal model, we can affirm that the function of (theatrical) representation has a multitude of fuzzy values, situated between a theoretically absolute embodiment and a theoretically complete "distanciation." For instance, the former tends to be manifested in the "mimetic" rites (Durkheim) and in Stanislavski’s poetics. The latter is known as Brecht Verfremdungseffekt, or "alienantion effect," also to be found in traditional drama of the Extreme Orient, which inspired Brecht. (Today in the United States, Stanislavsks’s theories are a very important source of study for many actors. In contrast to Stanislavski, Brecht theorizes Verfremdungseffekt, endowing it with ideological connotations.) In mimetic rites, it is compulsory for the interpreter to identify itself with the archetypal character; this is a primary condition for the social, magical or religious efficiency of the ritualistic act(ing). More than (theatrical) performance, ritualistic act(ing) is a performative (re)presentation, i.e., the very archetypal event, in its immediate unfolding: drômenon as "lived transcendence" (Gusdorf), and Gadamerian metamorphosis. Alternatively, for both identification and distanciation as manners of acting, the concept of dialogism (Bakhtin) highlights one and the same discursive mechanism. The advantage is that the analysis of such a heterogeneous corpu—from modern theatre poetics to the ancient ritualistic performance—may operate in a relatively homogeneous way, with the same descriptive categories, borrowed from dialogic theory, and from theory of speech and fictional acts. Situated on the same axis of interpretation/ (re)presentation, "identification" and "distanciation" are fuzzy categories, with differences between them difficult to establish. This evokes Diderot's famous paradox, as reformulated by Lee Strasberg: "to move the audience, the actor must himself remain un moved.”

Keywords: (Theatrical) Performance, Identification, Distanciation, Artaud, Brecht, Gadamer, Stanislavski

The International Journal of the Humanities: Annual Review, Volume 10, pp.79-91. Article: Print (Spiral Bound). Article: Electronic (PDF File; 322.663KB).

Nicoleta Popa Blanariu

University "Vasile Alecsandri", Romania

Nicoleta teaches comparative literature at the University "Vasile Alecsandri." Her interests in research include literary anthropology, comparative intercultural studies, intermediality, visual semiotics, and performance studies. She published articles in Romanian, French and English, a single-authored book Când gestul rupe tăcerea. Dansul şi paradigmele comunicării (When the Gesture Breaks the Silence: Dancing and the Paradigms of Communication) (2008) and the translation of Patrice Pavis's Dictionnaire du théâtre as Dictionar de teatru (with Florinela Floria, 2012). Her most recent works includes: “Towards a Framework of a Semiotics of Dance” in CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 15, no. 1 (2013) ; “Narrativity as Transmediality. Dancing Literature: A Reverse Ekphrasis” in On Intermedial Aesthetics and World Literatures (Journal of Comparative Literature and Aesthetics [special issue ed. by Asunción López Varela, 2013]); “Performativity and Ritualistic Interaction” in Perspectives on Interaction, Cambridge Scholars Publishing (ed. by E. Bonta, 2013).